This is the last post on my favorite instructional book, Finding Your Writer's Voice., and so I thought it only appropriate to end with chapter forty-two, which starts by quoting Robert Frost. "No surprise for the writer, no surprise for the reader".
Boxing yourself in with a strict plot line often leads to predictable pathways, and let's face it, there's nothing more disappointing than getting a third the way through a book and being able to guess with a 97% probability how it's going to end.
But, if only for a moment, what if you strayed? Sure, you might just waste time, but you also might find that your villain actually has a compassionate side, or there may be a hidden story swimming just beneath that set-in-stone structure you swear will assure your success.
Frank and Wall state "...to make something happen, you have to deviate from the intended story and write at the edges of the known. This often is a risky proposition, and indeed, it's probably one of the reasons writers are willing to spend hours writing lifeless, utterly safe revisions."
By now I'm sure you've guessed that I am a fly-by-the-seat-of-your-pants kind of writer. Pretty much my day-to-day existence thrives on a big wing, big prayer. I love swimming in the unknown, firm in the faith of my imagination. But I understand that to some this may seem odd, possibly just downright weird.
Some of the most successful authors would never write this way. They are incredible at their craft; using graphic organizers to help them see the contrast in their characters, having a formula for the flow of a plot. They've figured out what the masses want and they're more than happy to oblige. While I admire their ability to write stories in a concise manner and crank out great work, I often wonder what would have happened if they would have strayed a little, let that character fumble in the dark, taken a left when they had planned to go right. It's an intriguing thought, isn't it?
Have you ever surprise yourself? Did it help your writing?